7 Final comments
The broad conclusions and recommendations from the exposed work converge towards the enhancement in terms of public awareness and perception, education, training and research concerning the seismic risk mitigation. Ideally, the strategy to mitigate seismic risk should address land use zoning (reducing exposure), planning and of adequate strengthening campaigns and the implementation of seismic building codes suitable both for new and existing structures (reducing the seismic vulnerability of the built environment). Moreover, with an appropriate and assertive policies, fi nancial and institutional supports at both national and local levels it is possible to carry this strategy into a workable action plan.
As expected, in terms of damage and loss estimation, the results achieved for the case study of Horta’s historical centre were found, not as impressive as in other potential case studies (e.g. historical centre of Faro city), due to the large infl uence of the vulnerability index over the loss estimation formulations and to the low range of the obtained vulnerability index values of the evaluated building stock, estimated through the application of the seismic vulnerability index methodology. Despite the simplifi cations inherent to the methodology itself, these results were well adjusted to the slight damage levels observed in the city of Horta, in the aftermath of the 1998 Azores earthquake.