7. Results and discussion The proposed solution to solve this problem is described in this section. The effect of actual heat loss/gain from the copper block to the adjoining heater structure, insulation and surroundings is to reduce/increase the surface temperature for a given heat flux and spray conditions. If a large copper block with no heat loss is modelled in the inverse problem being solved it will result in increase/ decrease of transient surface temperature (compared to actual experimental conditions) during cooling/heating. Since the total measurement time is short (200–500 s), it is a valid assumption to model a slightly longer copper block, whose extra thermal mass will take into account the transient heat loss/gain. However if the assumed size is smaller compared to the actual equivalent size, then the heat transfer coefficients during transient heating will be higher than the actual value. This means that for an applied heat flux and measured temperature, the model would represent that less energy is used up for self-heating and large amount of heat is removed from the top boundary. Similarly during a cooling curve, during which heat supply is turned off, for a measured temperature drop, a smaller size of the equivalent copper block length would mean that the amount of heat flux removed is lower and would result in lower heat transfer coefficients. So a smaller assumed length would result in higher heat transfer coefficients during transient heating and lower values during transient cooling. However the heat transfer coefficient is expected to be the same at a given surface temperature for the same flow conditions. So the length is varied until the heat transfer coeffi- cients for heating and cooling converge. It should be noted that it is assumed that the heat transfer is more prominently one dimensional and the lateral conduction will not significantly affect the inverse heat conduction problem solved to estimate the transient heat flux removed at the top boundary.