7. Conclusions
This paper is one of the first to identify and assess the success factors of equity crowdfunding campaigns targeted mostly to unaccredited investors, or the “crowds”. We have provided suggestive evidence that the investment decision criteria of unaccredited equity crowdfunding investors are more similar to those of providers of other types of crowdfunding than to those of more traditional providers of early-stage financing. We find that the criteria typically used by angel or VC investors are not relevant for equity crowdfunding investors, whose investment decisions depend rather on easily observable features of crowdfunding campaigns, network utilization, and understandability of the target's products. Campaign success is associated with several campaign characteristics, the most important of which include early funding collected from private networks, social media networks, and the size of the minimum allowed investment. In addition, success drivers related to the number of investors include the funding target, campaign duration, the provision of financial information in the pitch, and a B2C orientation of the company's offering. Conversely, a thorough assessment of the company in terms of team, markets, concept, scalability, stage, and deal terms do not seem to predict success in equity crowdfunding. Our overall conclusion is in line with a speculation made by Frydrych et al. [20,21]. They note that emotional and social criteria may be more important to equity crowdfunders than financials. The observation leading them to this speculation is that the contracts prevalent in equity crowdfunding are typically not very attractive from the perspective of financial investors, with long-term durations and without dividends or voting rights.