Discussion
In this study, relationships between smoking status, stress, stress eating, and BMI were examined. Contrary to expectations, smokers and nonsmokers did not differ in stress eating and BMI. However, an indirect effect of smoking status on BMI was found, which was moderated by perceived stress. Being a smoker was indirectly associated with a lower body weight through eating less when stressed, but only in individuals who actually reported being stressed.
Stress can induce craving and greater activity in the striatum in substance users but not in controls (Sinha, 2008) and can enhance the propensity to eat high calorie food via its interaction with central reward pathways (Sominsky & Spencer, 2014). As stressed smokers reported to eat less than usual and stressed nonsmokers reported to eat more than usual, the present findings dovetail with the idea of a “brain reward site competition.” Specifically, a shared neural reward pathway may be “occupied” by a rewarding substance and, thus, individuals tend to consume one rewarding substance to the other’s exclusion (Cummings, Ray, & Tomiyama, 2017; Jastreboff et al., 2015; Meule, 2014; Warren & Gold, 2007). That is, smokers seem to retreat to smoking as their favorite drug for coping with stress and are, therefore, “immune” against other substances or behaviors that might serve this function. However, it has been argued that although reward-related brain mechanisms of food and drug consumption overlap, there are also notable differences both on a neural and behavioral level (DiLeone, Taylor, & Picciotto, 2012; Rogers, 2017) and, thus, other explanations for the current findings need to be considered as well.