4. Discussion
The SP and CP systems have similar OZ volumes at the 5:00 A.M. sampling times. Although they were equipped with the same number of aerators and the water had the ability to disperse farther throughout the larger CP system, the OZ in the SP was actually larger in terms of the OZ volume and total mass of DO within it. The fish zone of the SP was completely oxygenated (entire area >2.5 mg/L) at all sampling times with the exception for SP-1 at 5:00 A.M. in July and SP-2 when at 12:00 A.M., 5:00 A.M., and 9:00 A.M. in July. This was likely caused by an exceptionally large algal bloom for SP-2. Chlorophyll a data gathered from this pond one day prior to placing data loggers in the pond averaged 4874.45 g/L. The consumption of oxygen by this large phytoplankton bloom may have reduced oxygen in the fish zone to below 2.5 mg/L. Therefore, the size of the OZ and the amount of oxygen in it shrunk, and increased the fish density and kg fish/m3. Another possible explanation for the low DO in the fish zone of the SP system, particularly SP-1, could be the suspension of sediment that can cause DO depletion (Steeby et al., 2004). This resuspension of sediment could be caused by the high aeration rates in the relatively small fish zone of the SP, which could disturb the sediment and increase clay particles in water (Hollerman and Boyd, 1980). While almost every night in the fish zone of the SP system was fully oxygenated, there is a chance placement of the aerators near one of the sluiceways contributed to some loss of water with high DO. It is likely a minimal loss, but placement of aerators might have an influence on the oxygen dynamics of the OZs in the SP system. DO depletions in the fish zone of the SP system could also be the result of increased feeding rate compared to the CP system. Higher feeding rate is associated with longer durations of lower DO concentrations (Hargreaves and Steeby, 1999).