4. Discussion
Examination of the psychological predictors of structured activity could provide a useful step forward in understanding variation in structured activity and provide a means of linking it meaningfully with risk. In this study we examined the role of metacognitive beliefs, whilst controlling for other factors that could also contribute to social functioning outcome.
Consistent with our predictions, metacognitive belief was found to be a negative correlate of structured activity. A single metacognitive belief subscale, negative beliefs about uncontrollability of thoughts and danger, predicted structured activity over and above control variables. The findings show that the higher the score on this subscale, the lower the social functioning. This was the case after controlling for age, gender,treatment allocation,positive symptom severity, social anxiety, depression and cognitive schemas. Due to the lack of past research exploring the effects of metacognitive beliefs on social functioning, we were unsure which subscales would be predictors in the regression model. These results give us a better idea of specifically which metacognitive beliefs may need to be targeted and examined further.
Although three of the four cognitive schemas correlated with social functioning, when added to the regression model none of the cognitive schema subscales predicted social functioning. Social anxiety was the only symptom to correlate with structured activity. None of the symptoms included in the regression model were found to predict structured activity.