Conclusions
Data from the studies above described show that the use of MSCs may induce appreciable amelioration in neurodegenerative diseases, where only poor results can be achieved by pharmacological approaches or other therapeutic strategies. Beneficial MSC-induced effects primarily rely on their particular tendency to home to injured areas, in particular to hypoxic, apoptotic or inflamed areas (Fig.1). Notably, their ability to pass the BBB has permitted different administration routes (Kerkis et al., 2015). In fact, MSC engrafting at the injured nervous tissue has been reported not only upon intracerebral injection, but also after intracerebroventricular, intracarotid, intravenous, or even intranasal administration.
However, it should be pointed out that, although less invasive, systemic administrations have some limitations. After intravenous injections, many cells are trapped in the lungs and fail to reach target tissues. Intra-arterial delivery implies more invasive procedures and may lead to microthrombi formation, thus compromising tissue microcirculation. The wide dispersion of cells in the blood stream would require a strong homing ability, which may be affected by the loss of expression of homing molecules during in vitro expansion. In this regard, different strategies have been developed. For example, by expanding MSCs under hypoxic conditions, by adding various chemicals or cytokines to the culture medium or by genetic engineering to overexpress homing molecules. These issues have been extensively addressed in a recent review by De Becker and Van Riet (2016).