ترجمه مقاله نقش ضروری ارتباطات 6G با چشم انداز صنعت 4.0
- مبلغ: ۸۶,۰۰۰ تومان
ترجمه مقاله پایداری توسعه شهری، تعدیل ساختار صنعتی و کارایی کاربری زمین
- مبلغ: ۹۱,۰۰۰ تومان
Abstract
This paper proposes a new value-based indicator to assess the performance of actors in the supply chain in terms of resource efficiency and circular economy. Most of the methodologies developed so far measure resource efficiency on the basis of the environmental burden of the resource relative to the value of output. However, the key point of circular economy is keeping resources within the economy when products no longer serve their functions so that materials can be used again and therefore generate more value. The unit in which resource efficiency and circular economy are measured greatly affects both the ease of acceptance by policymakers and the direction in which green policy will change our society. Whereas the most common approaches to assessing resource efficiency and circular economy use mass, in this paper we advocate measuring both resource efficiency and circular economy in terms ofthe market value of ‘stressed’ resources, since this value incorporates the elements of scarcity versus competition as well as taxes representing urgent social and environmental externalities. The market value of resources is well-documented and responds automatically to the locality and time at which resources are used. Applying this unit, circularity is defined as the percentage of the value of stressed resources incorporated in a service or product that is returned after its end-of-life. Resource efficiency is the ratio of added product value divided by the value of stressed resources used in production or a process thereof. It is argued that precisely the concept of a free market, in which materials, parts and components are exchanged purely on the basis of their functionality and cost, allows the resource efficiency of a process (KPI for industry and governance) to be distinguished from the resource efficiency of a product (KPI for consumers and governance). Using standard industry data from Statistics Netherlands, the resource efficiency of several Dutch industries were evaluated using the new methodology and compared with a traditional mass-based approach.
9. Conclusions
In this paper we proposed and presented a test of the valuebased resource efficiency (VRE) indicator – a new method to measure resource efficiency and circularity that is more aligned with the market value of resources. The underlying research used standardised data on industry sectors from Statistics Netherlands to compare the resource efficiency of 40 Dutch sectors indicated by the VRE and by a traditional massbased approach. The sectors that rank less resource efficient according to VRE than the mass-based indicator are those where the prices of the inputs used are high. In particular, the ‘manufacture of computers, electronic and optical products’ and the ‘manufacture of other transport equipment’ sectors stand out in this respect. Sectors that rank more resource efficient with the value-based indicator are typically resource intensive. However, the input resources usually have a lower price per unit. In particular, the ‘mining and quarrying (no oil and gas)’ and the ‘extraction of crude petroleum and natural gas’ sectors are more efficient under the new indicator. We believe that because of its simplicity, robustness, cost effectiveness and adaptability, as well as its alignment with policy and other economic indicators, and its correlation with environmental impact, the VRE indicator can be useful to monitor and assess progress towards greater resource efficiency at both the local and the global scale.