7. Conclusions and future work
Within a supervised-learning paradigm, this study has addressed this challenge by utilising EEG signals to classify seizure and non-seizure records. Our approach posits a new method for generalising seizure detection across different subjects without prior knowledge about the focal point of seizures. Our results show an improvement on existing studies with 88% for sensitivity, 88% for specificity and 93% for the area under the curve, with a 12% global error, using the kNN classifier. The results suggest that the algorithms in-situ with existing clinical systems and practices may enable clinicians to make a diagnosis of epilepsy and instigate treatment earlier. It can help to reduce costs by limiting the number of trained specialists required to perform the interpretation by automating the detection of correlates of seizure activity generalised across different regions of the brain and across multiple subjects. There are a large number of features reported in the literature, which have not been considered in this paper. In particular our future work will consider the set of features described in Logesparan et al. [34], Logesparan et al. [35]. Furthermore, our future work will investigate the use of more advanced machine learning algorithms, despite the good performance of the classifiers considered in this paper. In particular, we will investigate the use of convolutional neural networks [53] and SVM with different kernels [54].