6. Discussions and conclusions
The major contribution of this paper is that it is among the first to examine the issue of IoT adoption in logistics and supply chain management using mixed research methods. The mixed method strategy offers a better insight in understanding incentives behind firms’ decisions to adopt IoT than just the use of either the qualitative or quantitative method alone. This section first employs meta-inference analysis to develop a consensus between the qualitative and quantitative findings and then presents managerial implications and concluding remarks.
6.1 Meta-inference
To evaluate the research findings obtained in the previous section, meta-inference analysis is applied with the bridging approach in the following discussions to develop a consensus between qualitative and quantitative findings (Venkatesh et al., 2013). The qualitative data analysis in Phase I reveals that technology benefits have a positive effect on IoT adoption; however, the uncertainties about IoT technology could compromise the perceived benefits of IoT and might lower the adoption intention of an organization. The qualitative results also indicate that organizational level concerns (such as cost concerns) might become barriers to adoption, and the most influential factor affecting IoT adoption of an organization might be the external motivation force. The qualitative findings in phase I are mostly confirmed by quantitative data analysis whereby perceived benefits, perceived cost, and external pressure have a significant impact on the IoT adoption intention. The fact that perceived trustworthiness of technology has a positive influence on perceived benefits is also supported and echoes the qualitative finding that uncertainties (less trust) lead to lower perceived benefits of IoT, and vice versa.