Conclusions
We have argued that the current practice of MC integration, resulting in a report on the integral estimate and its error estimate, should always be accompanied by a second-order error estimate, if only to validate the assignment of confidence levels to the result (which can be, for instance, crucial in comparing the results of different MC calculations, which is good and common practice). We have presented the relevant estimators. A closer look at E4 shows potential positivity problems and we have emended this by defining an improved estimator Eˆ 4. We also point out that, on the one hand, the convergence of the second-order error, Eˆ 1/4 4 /E2 1/2 ∼ N −1/4 , rather than the ‘well-known’ E2 1/2 /E1 ∼ N −1/2 convergence of the error itself, and that on the other hand E2 satisfies its own version of the central-limit theorem. In addition, we have extended the methods of the Chan–Golub–Leveque algorithm [4] to allow for a numerically stable computation of not only E2 but Eˆ 4 as well.