4. Discussion
Many previous studies found that the mean home ranges of male pet cats were larger than those for females, but this was not statistically significant (Kays and DeWan, 2004; Lilith et al., 2008; Morgan, 2002; Thomas et al., 2014). However, combining the evidence from all known studies showed that male cats do have statistically larger home ranges than females, using both meta-analysis and linear mixed models. Liberg et al. (2000) suggested that in entire cats, male home ranges are determined by the availability of females and female home ranges are clustered around food sources. This led to the conclusion that desexing female cats is unlikely to have an effect on home range but that desexing male cats should decrease their home range, because they should become more interested in food than females (Barratt, 1997). We found no evidence to support this hypothesis from the meta-analysis or the mixed-effects model. Guttilla and Stapp (2010) also found that desexing had no impact on the movements of feral cats, so this conclusion is equally applicable to pet and farm cats. It also has implications for the management of cat colonies by trap-neuter-release (TNR) (Longcore et al., 2009), because it is unlikely to reduce roaming by cats desexed and released. However, an unknown factor in the analyses is the age at which each cat was desexed. It is possible that if a cat is desexed as an adult once its home range has been established, desexing does not change its home range. This is suggested by Bradshaw (1992), citing data from Chipman (1990), who found that a male cat that had been desexed at age four had a similar home range to entire male cats. This was opposed to the other male cats (presumably desexed as kittens), which had similar home ranges to females, which were smaller than those of entire male cats. It is possible that if a cat is desexed before it is sexually mature and its home range has not been fully established, desexing may reduce home range.