6. Conclusion
The drivers of disclosure by mutual organizations such as SACCOs have received minimal attention by researchers with most studies concentrating on credit unions in more developed economies. Studies such as Hyndman et al. (2004) posit that very little is known regarding the level of disclosure of wider social information by SACCOs. As an extension of disclosure studies in credit unions, this study analyzes managerial perspectives on the users, rationale and drivers of financial and social disclosure practices by SACCOs in Kenya, which is a developing economy characterized by the most vibrant SACCO sector in Africa. The study finds that SACCO members and regulators mainly utilize disclosures by SACCOs. The results seem to suggest that SACCOs in Kenya provide disclosures to comply with regulatory requirements as well as improve their image. The results reveal that majority of disclosures by deposit-taking SACCOs in Kenya focus on mandatory financial aspects whichis at anaverage of 94.5%. This is followedby voluntary disclosure on strategic aspects (59.2%), social aspects (48.8%), governance aspects (37.4%) and environmental conservation (23.6%)in that order. SACCO disclosures in Kenya seem to be driven by regulations, financial performance and governance. Specifically, the results illustrate that disclosures by SACCOs in Kenya are positively influenced by governance. According to the findings, the influence of the guidelines issued by the professional accounting body in Kenya and financial performance on disclosure seem to be weak. Other significant drives of disclosure by SACCOs include resources (assets) and licensing.