5. Conclusions
The aim of the paper is to develop and expand theories of the ability of the EO sub-dimensions to act in unique combinations with each other, as well as, with competitive strategy, in the form of differentiation and cost leadership. Beyond this, the paper provides a typology of three ideal types assumingly leading to contingency fit, which in turn would lead to high performance. The empirical findings indicate, indeed, that three viable sufficient solutions related to high firm performance exist. Two of the sufficient solutions closely reassembled the theorized ‘Originalizers’, which focuses on differentiation in combination with innovativeness and proactiveness, and the third sufficient solution closely resembled the theorized ‘Evaluators’, which focuses on a mixed strategy with risk aversion, reactiveness, and low innovativeness. However, the theorized ‘Systematizers’ focuses on cost leadership in combination with reactiveness and low innovativeness is not present in the empirical analysis.