4.4. The limits to adaptation in unfamiliar climates
The accumulation of local ecosystem management regimes, and an understanding of the range of conditions over which they could be successfully applied, was one of the defining accomplishments of 20thcentury forest management. This structuring of ecological knowledge into climatic and edaphic classes based on the concept of ecological equivalence is exemplified by BEC, which provides a framework to define limits to the spatial transferability of management regimes, genetic resources, and natural resources legislation. Climate change undermines a core underpinning of this knowledge base—that the future will resemble the past on the timescales over which forests are managed. Climate analogs can assist forest managers with redeploying their hard-won knowledge across the changing climates of their land base, and with sourcing non-local management strategies for the locally unfamiliar climates of the 21st century. However, a distinct problem of managing ecosystems in a non-stationary climate is that predicted ecosystem responses, and the applicability of knowledge derived from climate analogs, cannot be verified except by waiting for events to unfold (Rastetter, 1996), at which point the predictions are moot. In addition, the future state of local climates is subject to many uncertainties stemming from global climate models (Deser et al., 2012; Knutti and Sedláček, 2012). These factors constrain the time horizon over which forest managers can place confidence in guidance from climate analogs.