دانلود رایگان مقاله Bakul Gendong به عنوان یک استراتژی ارتباطی برای رد ساختن یک کارخانه سیمان در جاوه مرکزی

abstract

Since 2006, one of Indonesia’s biggest corporations operating in the cement industry has been trying to build a factory at Sukolilo village in Central Java, Indonesia. The potential for of environmental damage caused by mining and the construction of this new factory is the main source of conflict between the public and the giant corporation. The focus of this research was the communication strategy adopted by women in the community to reject the construction of the cement factory in Pati, Central Java, Indonesia. This research used a qualitative method through a case study approach. Interviews, observations, and literature studies were used as data collection techniques for in this research. We found that the practices of the “Bakul Gendong” communication strategy were effective in developing women’s awareness of environmental issues based on the values they believe in. Through the women peddlers, women’s awareness of the risk of environmental damage caused by the cement factories was successfully developed. They also created female farmers’ group named “Simbar Wareh” to strengthen cooperation between them and to better-organize their resistance. The women’s movementto resistthe cementfactory was also conducted by building a network, meeting authorities, demonstrating, displaying traditional symbols during celebrations such as the “Agustusan” (independence day celebration) and Kartinian (women’s day) as their sites of resistance. The local government and PT. Semen Gresik tended to use technical and economical communicative approaches, while the people mainly refer to local know how PT. Semen Gresik did not use the right communication strategy to understand the conflict that arose and how to handle it, until after 10 years of trying to build a factory in Sukolilo

5. Discussion

The phenomena raised in this research is about an intercultural conflict among communities who have different points of view. There are the people of Sukolilo who refused and those who accept the cement factory, the academic group that concluded different EIA(AMDAL) results, and then there are the law enforcers that gave different verdicts in deciding whether or not to build the cement factory. Conflicts arose because of miscommunications or lack of communication between local government and the people. The cement factory should have taken into account the social aspects and the local culture and values more seriously before chosing a location for the cement factory.