5. Discussion and conclusion
5.1. Theoretical implications Theory development on governance and tenure is often based on the United States governance configurations. In these studies there are most frequently limited to zero differences in tenure between the chair and CEO because of the wide practice of duality. In Anglo legal jurisdictions including Australia and the United Kingdom there is much wider practice of separation with the appointment of a different person to the chair and the CEO roles respectively (Kiel & Nicholson, 2003a). This study shows that new governance insights emerge from studying non-United States governance configurations, in this case the Australian configuration has important theoretical and practical implications for chair, CEO and inside director research. This study unpacks the complex relationship between the chair, the CEO and inside directors in an environment of separation and shows how these people working together can deliver better organization performance.