دانلود رایگان مقاله نمایندگی در برابر پیچیدگی و آینده حرفه ارزیابی فرض آگاه

Abstract

This final chapter in the volume pulls together common themes from the diverse set of articles by a group of eight authors in this issue, and presents some reflections on the next steps for improving the ways in which evaluators work with assumptions. Collectively, the authors provide a broad overview of existing and emerging approaches to the articulation and use of assumptions in evaluation theory and practice. The authors reiterate the rationale and key terminology as a common basis for working with assumption in program design and evaluation. They highlight some useful concepts and categorizations to promote more rigorous treatment of assumptions in evaluation. A three-tier framework for fostering agency for assumption-aware evaluation practice is proposed-agency for themselves (evaluators); agency for others (stakeholders); and agency for standards and principles.

2. Conclusion

In sum, assumption-aware evaluation practice is foundational to performing sound evaluations yet it remains a poorly developed area of evaluation theory and practice to date. Emergent approaches to working with assumptions, their challenges and potential need discussion and synthesis. Assumption awareness in program design and evaluation ability for stakeholders to ‘act on their values’ and evaluators to produce evaluations that more carefully consistently describe those changes that really mattered. This volume has brought together a diversity of viewpoints on how assumptions impact evaluators work, particularly in complex contexts and with increasingly complex evaluands. Common themes emerge from each of the authors on the importance of having a solid awareness of the role of assumptions when selecting methodology, approaches, and tools. These are not choices that should be made consciously with full awareness of the underlying assumptions of those choices. There is also a tendency towards pragmatism
working with assumptions brings clarity to your evaluation and program designs that is a hallmark of program success. Finally, it seems that the evaluation policy environment and normative guidance have yet to catch up with the emergent practice in working with complex evaluands and in complex environments. Those closest to the stakeholders working with complex social interventions and on wicked problems know that surfacing and articulating assumptions is at the core of an evaluators evolving role. Mandated tools and approaches from funding partners, training and the literature have the potential to contribute to an environment more conducive to facing complexity if they put more focus on assumption awareness. This volume is only a first step towards a broader inquiry into the nature of assumptions in evaluative processes and practice. Intentional program of research, innovation and comparison of more assumption aware evaluative methods will likely make a relevant contribution to program evaluation and design in the age of complexity.