ترجمه مقاله نقش ضروری ارتباطات 6G با چشم انداز صنعت 4.0
- مبلغ: ۸۶,۰۰۰ تومان
ترجمه مقاله پایداری توسعه شهری، تعدیل ساختار صنعتی و کارایی کاربری زمین
- مبلغ: ۹۱,۰۰۰ تومان
ABSTRACT
This paper presents coping mechanisms that address competing institutional logics in UniversityBusiness Co-operation (UBC). We examined academics at two Indonesian universities and in two science fields, computer science and electrical engineering. Our findings suggest that the level of the integration of business and science logic determines their coping strategies. Academics can act as a hybrid who bridges the two worlds by “compartmentalizing” them. This study infers that inexperienced academics must “learn” in advance about the logic of business before involving themselves in collaboration with business projects.
Discussion and conclusion
The purpose of this study was to examine how individual academics cope with the divergent institutional practices of science and business in the UBC framework. By contrasting two groups of academics (experienced and inexperienced with business) at two universities (public and private universities) and two fields of sciences (Computer Science and Electrical Engineering), we studied the variation of individual academics’ responses on competing institutional demands. With respect to the adherence to the science logic, there is no discrepancy in the practices and norms of science between the two universities, particularly in how science is interpreted (see Table 3). This shows academics at both universities and both fields are complying with the common values of electrical engineering and computer science education and research, which caused academics in these fields to comply with similar values and practices (Whitley, 2000; Denning, 2005). Academics with inexperience with business are labelled as “novice” with business logic. It was argued that their research can be encompassed into two trajectories. The first trajectory is one that can be related to the business demand and complies with the setting of the research agenda. Academics that are inexperienced with business logic in both fields perceive that their field is “close” to the world of business, suggesting that forming a relationship with business is easy and doable.