5. Conclusions and further research
As I scroll through the posts and comments made by my Facebook friends, I like to imagine myself chatting with them over the rhetorical choices they have made. The complexity of their identifications astounds me. When I talk to my students over their social media uses, the rhetoric of their communication stands out as fertile grounds for research in its application to composition. More inquiry must be done to analyze the utility of these social networking sites. Gina Maranto and Matt Barton (2010) explained, “As rhetoricians, we cannot afford to ignore the opportunities for learning, for social and political engagement, that online networking affords.” They continued, “For [information specialists, linguists, librarians, compositionists, rhetoricians, and others], technologiessuch as Facebook and Myspace are seen as not only essential but almost inevitable for 21st century education.” These and many other scholars have reinforced the idea that digital rhetoric and technology are influential for pedagogy, and as a major part of those areas, social networking sites like Facebook are crucial to the field of composition research. These technologies need to be addressed because they are the way of the future. Teachers need to converge with students in the realms of composition that those students are already engaged in. By following the principles I have discussed in this paper, teachers will connect and even learn from their own students in allowing them to discover and apply the principle of identification.