Discussion
The findings of this investigation have demonstrated that the degree to which SMEs are enacting brand orientation can be gauged by the deliberateness with which they pursue branding practices. The importance of being deliberate is evident in the literature, but the explicit consideration of deliberateness as a conduit between theory and strategic implementation has not been acknowledged until now. There are a number of scholars who have noted the need for a deliberate approach. For instance, in his seminal work Urde (1999, p. 123) argued ‘‘…the need for a deliberate approach to brands as strategic resources’’. Based on her qualitative examination of the charity sector Hankinson (2001, p. 235) found that ‘‘managing the brand actively and deliberately was a crucial step in co-ordinating brand activity for the charity and engaging others in the process’’ (Hankinson 2001, p. 235). More recently Gromark and Melin (2011, p. 395) stated ‘‘we want to emphasise that brand orientation requires a deliberate approach, since many organisations have an adhoc approach to brand building’’. These authors, along with the findings of this study, position deliberateness at the very foundation of brand orientation. An ‘‘adhoc approach to branding’’ does not lend itself to the organisation-wide coordination around a single brand identity required in enacting brand orientation. More authors still (e.g. Baumgarth 2010; Hankinson 2011) have been observed to hold an assumption of a deliberate strategy formation process (Mintzberg and Waters 1985) within the body of literature on brand orientation, without discussing the relevance of this assumption.