4. Discussion
The purpose of this review was to examine the breadth and depth of concept mapping in the set of identified dissertations written since 1985. Among the first conclusions to be drawn is support for the remarkable flexibility of the method. As Kane and Trochim (2007) put it: “ . . . the concept mapping analysis is a standardized approach, but it allows for tremendous flexibility and adaptability to address different kinds of questions and problems” (p.108). The variety of topics and research questions observed in the dissertation review ranged from topics near its origins in structured conceptualization in evaluation research to distal topics in medicine, civil engineering, business and many other fields. In addition, the procedures employed generally followed the standard steps closely but evidenced adaptability in extensions to theoretical and applied problems of many kinds. Some of the innovative methods used by students merit replication and refinement as the CM/PM method evolves. For example, internal validity did not receive as much attention as other forms of validity, but one study (Adu, 2011) developed a video to demonstrate sorting and rating. Further study of methods of reducing noise in sorting and rating data may prove to be valuable in enhancing internal validity. Most dissertations did not systematically collect feedback on the process from participants, and usability was not a focus of the present analysis, but there was evidence of participant confusion, frustration and fatigue in some of the studies, which may have negatively impacted internal validity