5. Conclusion
More and more enterprises are beginning to realise the importance of quality cost in quality control. Different quality cost prediction optimisation models can quantitatively forecast and simulate quality costs at different quality management levels. When there is a lack of information, a DGM can be used to predict the fluctuation trend of quality cost based on Juran’s quality cost characteristic curve. What’s more, the randomness of time series can be weakened by a weakening buffer operator before modelling, which can effectively reduce the factor perturbation and reduce the randomness of the data.
The purpose of the forecast is to control the quality of the enterprise better, and the effective control and management of the cost is an important guarantee for normal capital flows. Cost controls throughout the operation of the enterprise have always been implemented to establish a long and effective accounting system to strengthen scientific and rational cost accounting. At the same time, in the process of cost forecasting and control, we must consider all aspects of uncertainty derived from unknown factors, which is the only way to make the forecast more feasible for the quality of enterprise management to provide more practical guidance.
With the rise of “zero defect” management and total quality management (Dong et al., 2017), most companies are no longer using a single quality cost minimum target for quality control and management, but a large number of external factors should be taken into account by quality of cost models when establishing the actual dynamic cost forecasting model of an enterprise. The optimal quality level obtained by Juran’s quality cost curve is required to accept an unqualified product rate for the firm. With the passage of time and the improvement of management methods, the limitations of this quality cost model have become more and more obvious. In these circumstances, we should use new theories to guide quality cost management in enterprises.