دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی کیفیت خاک - یک بررسی منتقدانه - الزویر 2018

عنوان فارسی
کیفیت خاک - یک بررسی منتقدانه
عنوان انگلیسی
Soil quality – A critical review
صفحات مقاله فارسی
0
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
21
سال انتشار
2018
نشریه
الزویر - Elsevier
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی
PDF
کد محصول
E8076
رشته های مرتبط با این مقاله
مهندسی کشاورزی
گرایش های مرتبط با این مقاله
علوم خاک، زیست فناوری خاک
مجله
بیولوژی و بیوشیمی خاک - Soil Biology and Biochemistry
دانشگاه
Dept. of Soil Sciences - Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL - Ackerstrasse - Switzerland
کلمات کلیدی
خدمات اکوسیستم، شاخص، مجموعه داده های مینیمم، کیفیت زمین، نظارت، قابلیت خاك، باروری خاک، عملکرد خاک، سلامت خاک، ذینفع
۰.۰ (بدون امتیاز)
امتیاز دهید
چکیده

ABSTRACT


Sampling and analysis or visual examination of soil to assess its status and use potential is widely practiced from plot to national scales. However, the choice of relevant soil attributes and interpretation of measurements are not straightforward, because of the complexity and site-specificity of soils, legacy effects of previous land use, and trade-offs between ecosystem services. Here we review soil quality and related concepts, in terms of definition, assessment approaches, and indicator selection and interpretation. We identify the most frequently used soil quality indicators under agricultural land use. We find that explicit evaluation of soil quality with respect to specific soil threats, soil functions and ecosystem services has rarely been implemented, and few approaches provide clear interpretation schemes of measured indicator values. This limits their adoption by land managers as well as policy. We also consider novel indicators that address currently neglected though important soil properties and processes, and we list the crucial steps in the development of a soil quality assessment procedure that is scientifically sound and supports management and policy decisions that account for the multi-functionality of soil. This requires the involvement of the pertinent actors, stakeholders and end-users to a much larger degree than practiced to date.

نتیجه گیری

6. Outlook


Science plays an important part in the search, under prevailing pedo-climatic conditions (Fig. 1), for indicators of the structural and process aspects of soil functioning that mediate the delivery of soilbased ecosystem services deemed important by actors and other stakeholders who exert(ed) pressures on the soil through land use and soil threats. The key terms here are ‘actors’ and ‘stakeholders’. Terms such as ‘soil function’, ‘ecosystem service’ and, indeed, ‘soil quality’, are boundary concepts, i.e. concepts that enable researchers from different disciplines, policy-makers, and other stakeholders to develop a common language and integrate and derive knowledge relevant to their field (Schleyer et al., 2017). Beyond scientists, those who have an immediate stake in soil quality are land managers, i.e. farmers, managers of nature conservation areas, roadsides, banks of waterways and urban green areas, and the public at large. As soil quality management is also about societal negotiation in the face of unavoidable trade-offs between various soil uses, the very development of soil quality indicator schemes will benefit from the involvement of actors and other stakeholders with a view to implement adaptive land use and management (Barrios et al., 2006, 2012).


Although, clearly, soil quality is not merely a natural science topic, in most of the reviewed assessment schemes farmers/land managers did not play a leading role. We suggest that intimate involvement of end users is a major point of attention, but it may still not lead to full implementation of the results. For example, in the Illinois Soil Quality Initiative, where farmers were involved in the development of soil quality assessment schemes, they were constrained in the necessary implementation of the results by socio-economic factors (Wander et al., 2002). Clearly, other actors play an important part. Industries that ultimately also depend on the soil, will be (come) important actors, too, such as food, fibre and fuel industries, and electricity production, manufacturing and fashion industries (Davies, 2017). Their interest is in sustained resource supply, which is at stake because of ongoing loss of soil functionality and increased variability in harvests and water supply associated with global climate change, partly induced by unsustainable land use and management. Land managers, industries and, indeed, investors and insurance companies and the public sector at large are increasingly aware of the associated monetary and societal costs and, vice versa, they understand the urgency of adaptive land management and re-design in the framework of food systems (Foresight, 2011) and a fossil-free and circular economy (Rockström et al., 2016).


بدون دیدگاه