5. Conclusions and discussion
The conducted benchmarking stressed the case of Songdo/Incheon as most the “fully equipped” smart city. Singapore, Melbourne, Bodo, Delft and Toronto are also not far behind the leader. According to the official programs and plans, the following key areas of development in the cases were identified: ecology transport, comfort of life. However, the studied Smart Cities got quite high ranks in the following areas: Smart Living, Smart People, Smart Government.
To determine the most critical factors among the assessed indicators, we applied correlation analysis and revealed the following trends. The high level of Smart Environment resource management indicator statistically connects with a high level of Smart Economy opportunity (0,7 coeff.), Smart Living Safety (0,7), Clean and non-motorized mobility (0,6), Smart Building (0,6), and Open Government (0,5). At the same time, the higher the level of Resource management indicator in the measured cases, the lower was the level of Smart Economy Local and Global interconnectedness (-0,5) and Smart Economy Productivity level (-0,3). In turn, the Smart Economy Productivity level influences positively on Smart Living Culture and Happiness indicator (0,5) and Smart People Creativity (0,45).