6. Conclusion
We have demonstrated two key contributions in this study. The first and most important contribution is the further development of a PCA method for analyses of life cycle systems providing services. This is a significant and concluding step for the serial developments of the PCA method developed in 2014. The serial developments up to the present study have transformed a generic PCA method for analysis of energy producing systems to manufacturing systems, and to service providing systems. The serial developments and particularly the developments presented in this study have demonstrated the advantages of the quantitative formulations in deriving the system and boundary conditions. More importantly, this study represents the completion of the first stage of a larger study for the development of a global LCA model, which is recommended as future research works.
The next contribution lies with the new insights we have derived from the case study. Findings from this study show that indiscriminate speed reduction is not always desirable. Although the absolute quantity of the life cycle carbon emissions is reduced with reductions in ship speed, the total amount of crude oil transported over the tanker’s life time is also reduced. In effect, the energy and carbon efficiency of crude oil transport is also lowered if the ship speed is too low. When measured by the amount of carbon emissions released as a result of moving one tonne of crude oil over a distance of 1 km (mg-CO2/t-km), findings from this study suggest 12 knots as a reference speed at which the life cycle energy and carbon efficiency of crude oil transport is optimized. Using the reference optimum speed of 12 knots, we find that 5–10 mg-CO2/tkm can be used as a reference range of life cycle carbon emission factors for crude oil transport.