Conclusion
This study tends to complete research studies on how organizational culture shapes attitudes and behaviors and shows how a cultural change can resolve a conflict sequence. On a more empirical aspect, this study also presents a conflict resolution method when the roots of conflicts are embedded in shared organizational norms. In such conflict situations, interpersonal conflict resolution techniques may not solve the conflict sequence but a cultural change could finally put an end to the sequence. We have shown that the combination of the OCP survey (O’Reilly et al., 1991) and open culture deciphering interview (Schein, 2004, p. 217) helped understand the sources of interpersonal conflicts embedded in an organizational culture. We have also shown that cultural change, through key action and careful change management, resolved the conflict sequence by shifting the psychological factors (Rahim, 1983) of the conflicting parties to a more integrating or compromising style. Our work showed how organizational culture can be an important element in the explanation of conflict sources and conflict handling in cases of high and repeated conflict situations. It could thus be possible to resolve conflict sequence by changing a carefully chosen cultural trait. Nevertheless, the culture change management program is complex and risky. In a high-conflict situation, we identified four key conflict resolution factors: careful identification of the organizational culture traits dictating conflict handling style (O’Reilly et al., 1991; Schein, 2004); alignment of the management team on the cultural change plan (Colbert et al., 2008; Manville and Broad, 2013) to intensify the new set of behaviors (Burt et al., 1994; Sorensen, 2002); selection of the most efficient symbolic change decision (Pfeffer, 1981; Johnson, 1990); and careful implementation of the change management project (Cinite et al., 2009).