7. Discussion
By combining historical institutionalism, institutional logics and ideology, we promote better understanding of the path transformation of Brazilian slavery. Archival sources reveal that the institution of slavery evolved through competing logics. These were constructed and conveyed by a variety of symbolic forms that ranged from everyday linguistic statements, to more complex texts and images.
Government accounting and taxation were a part of a dense network of ties that reinforced institutions and rendered social systems more stable and coherent (Clemens & Cook, 1999). Brazil became increasingly dependent on fiscal revenues generated by taxes on slaves and trading in slaves. This encouraged a structural inertia that impeded the de-reification and abolition of slavery, despite international pressures and changing institutional logics. Thus, at a time when civil laws were reactive sequences, government accounting and taxation were self-reinforcing sequences. Over a long period of time, government accounting and taxation provided symbolic meaning in the service of power. It helped the dominant ideology by providing symbolic meaning through portraying slavery as permanent, unchanging and ever-recurring (reification). Analysis of the particular discourses of government accounting and taxation helps in understanding the symbolic meaning used by actors to make sense of (and give meaning to) a context. Commonly, as here, interaction between agents and sociallyproduced structures occurred through recursive practices that were part of daily routines.