دانلود رایگان مقاله اندازه گیری امنیت غذایی در مفهوم جهانی: ناامنی غذایی
|عنوان فارسی:||اندازه گیری امنیت غذایی در یک مفهوم جهانی: مقیاس تجربی ناامنی غذایی|
|عنوان انگلیسی:||Food security measurement in a global context: The food insecurity experience scale|
|تعداد صفحات مقاله انگلیسی : 7||تعداد صفحات ترجمه فارسی : ترجمه نشده|
|سال انتشار : 2018||نشریه : الزویر - Elsevier|
|فرمت مقاله انگلیسی : PDF||کد محصول : E5624|
|محتوای فایل : PDF||حجم فایل : Kb500|
|رشته های مرتبط با این مقاله: علوم اجتماعی|
|گرایش های مرتبط با این مقاله: جامعه شناسی|
|مجله: اندازه گیری - Measurement|
|دانشگاه: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations - Statistics Division (ESS) - Italy|
|کلمات کلیدی: اندازه گیری امنیت غذایی، مدل رش، معادله مقیاس، اهداف توسعه پایدار|
The ability of households and individuals to access food (one of the key aspects of 'food security') is an important welfare dimension that poses important challenges for objective measurement. This paper describes the Rasch model-based procedures developed to define the eight-item Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES) as a contribution towards the establishment of an indicator for global monitoring of food insecurity. Experiential food insecurity survey data, collected by FAO from nationally representative samples of the adult population, once every year in 2014, 2015 and 2016 from 153 countries or territories, are used to develop methods to estimate cross-country comparable prevalence rates of moderate and severe food insecurity. A Rasch model-based scale was estimated separately for each country and data were assessed for consistency with model assumptions. To ensure cross-country comparability, a procedure based on the median normalized severities of each of the eight FIES items was used to define a global reference scale, against which measures obtained in each country can be separately calibrated. Calibration is obtained by equating the mean and standard deviation of the severity parameters of the items that appear to be common between the national and the reference scale, and thus used as anchoring points for the metric. Data showed sufficient consistency with the Rasch model assumptions to produce reliable measures of the prevalence of food insecurity in each country. Calibration was possible using 4 or more items as anchoring points in 151 of 153 (98.7%) of the cases, and 6 or more items in the vast majority of them (121 cases). Concurrent validation of the estimates of prevalence of food insecurity at national level was obtained by comparing the FIES-based indicator with other established indicators of social (under) development. National prevalence rates of moderate-or-severe food insecurity obtained by FAO correlate well with the prevalence of undernourishment and with several widely used indicators of national income, health, and well-being. The proposed calibration method can be applied to other existing experience-based food security scales that use similar items, thus affording the possibility to use data collected with those instruments to produce internationally comparable measures of the prevalence of food insecurity. Pending broader adoption of the FIES or compatible experience-based food security scales worldwide, countries could choose to use the 2014–2016 results obtained using the data collected by FAO as the baseline to monitor progress towards Target 2.1 of the recently established 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
The analysis of FIES data collected over three years in more than 150 countries worldwide confirms that self-reported evidence on the occurrence of conditions typically associated with the inability to access food due to lack of money or other resources, gathered through simple interviews, can indeed inform the construction of a valid measurement scale of the severity of the food insecurity condition. Rasch modelbased analytic procedures, consistent with the item anchoring and scale equating procedures common in other applications of Item Response Theory (e.g., educational testing) has allowed for the definition of a global reference scale that can be used to ensure comparable estimates of the prevalence of food insecurity in different populations. The possibility to calibrate measures against the global standard is preserved when using other experience-based scales that share a sufficient number of items equivalent to those included in the FIES. In advocating for the adoption of the FIES or compatible scales, the inclusion of additional questions can be encouraged. Whether such additional questions effectively contribute to the measurement of the underlying latent trait may be explored in specific countries or cultures by examining their relationship with the standard FIES items using the proposed IRT statistical methods.
Pending broader adoption of the FIES or of compatible experiencebased food security scales by countries worldwide, FAO offers the 2014–2016 results obtained using the data collected through the Gallup World Poll as a possible baseline, against which to monitor progress towards Target 2.1 of the recently established 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.