دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی عوامل اولویت ساز سیاسی برای کاهش سیاست های خشونت علیه زنان در سریلانکا - NCBI 2018

عنوان فارسی
عوامل اولویت ساز سیاسی برای کاهش سیاست های خشونت علیه زنان در سریلانکا
عنوان انگلیسی
Factors shaping political priorities for violence against women-mitigation policies in Sri Lanka
صفحات مقاله فارسی
0
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
12
سال انتشار
2018
نشریه
Ncbi
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی
PDF
کد محصول
E7980
رشته های مرتبط با این مقاله
حقوق
گرایش های مرتبط با این مقاله
حقوق زنان
مجله
BMC بین المللی سلامت و حقوق بشر - BMC International Health and Human Rights
دانشگاه
Department of Global Health and Development - London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine - London - UK
کلمات کلیدی
خشونت علیه زنان، خشونت مبتنی بر جنسیت، خشونت شریک صمیمی، سریلانکا، تحلیل سیاسی، تنظیم برنامه
چکیده

Abstract


Background: Although violence against women (VAW) is a global public health issue, its importance as a health issue is often unrecognized in legal and health policy documents. This paper uses Sri Lanka as a case study to explore the factors influencing the national policy response to VAW, particularly by the health sector. Methods: A document based health policy analysis was conducted to examine current policy responses to VAW in Sri Lanka using the Shiffman and Smith (2007) policy analysis framework. Results: The findings suggest that the networks and influences of various actors in Sri Lanka, and their ideas used to frame the issue of VAW, have been particularly important in shaping the nature of the policy response to date. The Ministry of Women and Child Affairs led the national response on VAW, but suffered from limited financial and political support. Results also suggest that there was low engagement by the health sector in the initial policy response to VAW in Sri Lanka, which focused primarily on criminal legislation, following global influences. Furthermore, a lack of empirical data on VAW has impeded its promotion as a health policy issue, despite financial support from international organisations enabling an initial health systems response by the Ministry of Health. Until a legal framework was established (2005), the political context provided limited opportunities for VAW to also be construed as a health issue. It was only then that the Ministry of Health got legitimacy to institutionalise VAW services. Conclusion: Nearly a decade later, a change in government has led to a new national plan on VAW, giving a clear role to the health sector in the fight against VAW. High-level political will, criminalisation of violence, coalesced women’s groups advocating for legislative change, prevalence data, and financial support from influential institutions are all critical elements helping frame violence as a national public health issue.

نتیجه گیری

Conclusion


Although the health sector is recognized as an institution which needs to be involved when developing a multipronged solution, it is often a neglected player in development of legislation and there is little understanding of whether and how health sectors are involved in policy making nationally and globally on this issue. This policy analysis identified factors that have affected a health sector response to VAW in Sri Lanka. The tides are changing now with the new multisectoral plan on Sexual and Gender-Based Violence (SGBV) approved by the Cabinet, but a strong push from influential actors is still needed for an effective policy response to emerge within the health sector. High-level government officials, international agencies and MOH, all must agree to recognise VAW as a pertinent public health issue, and empirical data should be collected to support this recognition.


بدون دیدگاه