Discussion and implications
Theoretical implications
This research attests to the positive effects of CSR on company evaluations and subsequent purchase intentions via a key mediator of attributions of responsibility. Our findings reveal that consumers' selfserving bias was moderated in a product-failure setting, when the food marketer was perceived as being highly committed to tackle a major social issue such as childhood obesity. It is further important to mention that these perceived CSR initiatives triggered more favorable company evaluations and subsequent purchase intentions. As shown in our studies, when consumers read about a firm's plans to eliminate toy premiums with less healthy kids' meals, in addition to promoting healthier food products, their attributions of blame to the company in a productfailure setting, were likely reduced. As a result, they evaluated the firm in a more favorable manner and expressed higher levels of purchase intentions, as opposed to those participants who read about a company's plans to simply promote healthier kids' meals. In an online advertising context, our findings suggest a similar path; a corporation that demonstrates responsible behavior by radically changing its promotional strategies, enjoys more favorable consumer cognitive, attitudinal, and behavioral responses.