منوی کاربری
  • پشتیبانی: ۴۲۲۷۳۷۸۱ - ۰۴۱
  • سبد خرید

دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی ارزیابی مدیریت ریسک زنجیره تامین با استفاده از یک تاپسیس فازی یکپارچه - الزویر 2018

عنوان فارسی
ارزیابی مدیریت ریسک زنجیره تامین با استفاده از یک تاپسیس فازی یکپارچه - رویکردی انتقادی
عنوان انگلیسی
Evaluation of sustainable supply chain risk management using an integrated fuzzy TOPSIS - CRITIC approach
صفحات مقاله فارسی
0
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
19
سال انتشار
2018
نشریه
الزویر - Elsevier
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی
PDF
نوع مقاله
ISI
نوع نگارش
مقالات پژوهشی (تحقیقاتی)
رفرنس
دارد
پایگاه
اسکوپوس
کد محصول
E10342
رشته های مرتبط با این مقاله
مدیریت، مهندسی صنایع
گرایش های مرتبط با این مقاله
مدیریت ریسک، مدیریت استراتژیک، لجستیک و زنجیره تامین
مجله
مجله تولید پاک - Journal of Cleaner Production
دانشگاه
Department of Management - Urmia Branch - Islamic Azad University - Urmia - Iran
کلمات کلیدی
پایداری، مدیریت ریسک زنجیره تامین، مجموعه های فازی، تاپسیس، منتقد
doi یا شناسه دیجیتال
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.071
۰.۰ (بدون امتیاز)
امتیاز دهید
چکیده

abstract


Supply chain risk management research has mainly mistreated the important of sustainability issues. Moreover, there is little knowledge about sustainable management of risk and supply chain and the way they impose losses for firms. Risk management's duty in the supply chain is to identify, analyze, and provide solutions for accountability, control and monitor the risks in the economic and production cycle. This study aims to develop a framework for the sustainable supply chain risk management (SSCRM) evaluation. To this end, an integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach is proposed based on the technique in order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and criteria importance through inter-criteria correlation (CRITIC) methods. The literature was reviewed and the potential criteria were identified. Through an expert panel the criteria were filtered. Seven main criteria and forty-four sub-criteria were developed for the final evaluation SSCRM framework. The most dominant sub-criteria in each group found to be as; machines & equipment risks, key supplier failures, demand fluctuations, government policy risks, IT security, economic issues, and lack of proper sewage infiltration. Besides, A2 (Nouri complex) found to be the best practitioner. The methodology is successfully implemented in a real case company. The detailed account of implications and limitations are presented as the concluding remarks.

نتیجه گیری

Conclusion


Although vast research have produced useful understandings and analyzed the supply chain risks' nature, little study has been done to increase risk considerations that consist the idea of sustainability across the supply chain. Unfortunately, understanding what SSCRM means, and which information should be controlled is difficult, and by considering these risks, how risk reduction and management can be designed. The developing framework to identify and analyze SSCRM is grounded. By thinking of sustainability of supply chain as a process of risk management, the study contributes to the SSCRM literature. In today supply chain management, the two most important issues which are frequently intertwined, are the supply chain risk and sustainability and they are often viewed in separation. Since catastrophic events occur suddenly and leaving little time for adaptation; therefore, supply chains becoming more resilient is essential. In whole, supply chain risks involve external risks, such as logistical difficulties, supplier problems, and those sourcing from governmental actions, and internal risks (operations and primarily policies). Organizational sustainability, social responsibility, and the environmental sustainability are typically defined as three categories of sustainability. Actions in one area frequently influence the actions in the other area. For these reasons, meeting sustainability and supply chain risk cooperatively is sensible. This work tried to bridge sustainability and supply chain risk management, however, future works could focus on developing a conceptual framework for the evaluation of SSCRM. As it is still in the beginning and needs to be delved more on the topic. Various limitations can be counted in each phase of the research. First, although the researchers have tried to propose a comprehensive model for the sustainable risk evaluation process, but future research could focus on the different contexts to specify needs of various sections of industries.


بدون دیدگاه