Conclusion
Although vast research have produced useful understandings and analyzed the supply chain risks' nature, little study has been done to increase risk considerations that consist the idea of sustainability across the supply chain. Unfortunately, understanding what SSCRM means, and which information should be controlled is difficult, and by considering these risks, how risk reduction and management can be designed. The developing framework to identify and analyze SSCRM is grounded. By thinking of sustainability of supply chain as a process of risk management, the study contributes to the SSCRM literature. In today supply chain management, the two most important issues which are frequently intertwined, are the supply chain risk and sustainability and they are often viewed in separation. Since catastrophic events occur suddenly and leaving little time for adaptation; therefore, supply chains becoming more resilient is essential. In whole, supply chain risks involve external risks, such as logistical difficulties, supplier problems, and those sourcing from governmental actions, and internal risks (operations and primarily policies). Organizational sustainability, social responsibility, and the environmental sustainability are typically defined as three categories of sustainability. Actions in one area frequently influence the actions in the other area. For these reasons, meeting sustainability and supply chain risk cooperatively is sensible. This work tried to bridge sustainability and supply chain risk management, however, future works could focus on developing a conceptual framework for the evaluation of SSCRM. As it is still in the beginning and needs to be delved more on the topic. Various limitations can be counted in each phase of the research. First, although the researchers have tried to propose a comprehensive model for the sustainable risk evaluation process, but future research could focus on the different contexts to specify needs of various sections of industries.
