Conclusion
This article has argued that the FPA marks a further manifestation of how the EU–Australia relationship has both broadened to encompass more than just economics and deepened through the formalisation of bilateral engagement through numerous agreements. Since the mid to late 1990s, the EU and Australia have deepened their engagement to incorporate a multitude of areas, of which security has become a policy area where we have seen an increased awareness of shared interest in facilitating international peace and security. The FPA allows this awareness to have a practical application. The challenge for both Australia and the EU is to ensure that the FPA does not remain a paper commitment with little substance. At a time when the EU is faced with serious internal crises (the eurozone debt crisis, Brexit, the refugee crisis and internal disunity), and the EU and Australia are each trying to adapt to the shifting global dynamics, it could be tempting for Australia and the EU to shelve the FPA as not being of strategic importance. However, the agreement provides an important mechanism through which the EU and Australian can work together, along with other partners, to tackle growing regional and global instability and conflict. The fact that CSDP missions and operations can range in scope from peacekeeping to monitoring and mentoring operations provides significant scope for the EU and Australia to work together, especially within the Asia-Pacific. With the support of Asian interlocutors such as ASEAN, there is scope for the EU to launch capacity-building missions which Australia can actively contribute to.