دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی نوآوری مدل کسب و کار: بازسازی منطق کسب و کار در کشور میزبان توسط خرده فروشان بین المللی - الزویر 2018

عنوان فارسی
نوآوری مدل کسب و کار: چگونه خرده فروشان بین المللی منطق کسب و کار اصلی خود را در یک کشور میزبان جدید بازسازی می کنند
عنوان انگلیسی
Business model innovation: How the international retailers rebuild their core business logic in a new host country
صفحات مقاله فارسی
0
صفحات مقاله انگلیسی
20
سال انتشار
2018
نشریه
الزویر - Elsevier
فرمت مقاله انگلیسی
PDF
کد محصول
E7854
رشته های مرتبط با این مقاله
مدیریت
گرایش های مرتبط با این مقاله
مدیریت کسب و کار، بازاریابی، بازاریابی بین المللی
مجله
بررسی کسب و کار بین المللی - International Business Review
دانشگاه
NEOMA Business School (Rouen Business School and Reims Management School) - Boulevard André Siegfried - France
کلمات کلیدی
مدل تجاری، بین المللی سازی، رویکرد نظریۀ موردی
۰.۰ (بدون امتیاز)
امتیاز دهید
چکیده

ABSTRACT


Although research into the business model has received increasing attention, few studies have so far been conducted on business model innovation in an international context. The purpose of the study is to identify different patterns of business model innovation which enables international retailers to rebuild their core business logic in new host countries. On the basis of comparing and contrasting the business model changes of 15 international retailers from various home countries to one single host country (China), our study provides an indepth understanding of business model innovation in the context of international business. By looking at the firms’ capabilities in rebuilding their core logic in the setting of a host country, we reveal six routes of retail business model innovation. Utilizing the lens of organizational learning theory and internationalization, we identify three patterns of resource deployment by international companies in the process of developing business model innovations. Our study, therefore, provides insights and guidance for multinational companies in general, international retailers in particular, as for how to successfully adapt their business model from home country to host country.

نتیجه گیری

6. Discussion and conclusion


Internationalization of the firm can be understood as an innovation decision process (Andersen, 1993; Johanson & Vahlne, 2009; Jones & Coviello, 2005). Existing research suggests organizational learning, innovation and internationalization are linked together in a complex way (Chiva et al., 2014). Business model innovation provides a new source of sustained value creation for firms therefore a source of future competitive advantage (Foss & Saebi, 2017). We argue that research into business model innovation in the host country for MNEs will provide new insights into internationalization process as business model innovation not only deal with views from the ‘supply side’ but also the ‘demand side’ (Massa et al., 2017).


However, on the question of whether there exists different patterns of business model innovation which enable the international firms to rebuild the core logic of their business model in host country, we note that little study is available (Schneider & Spieth, 2013). Our study focuses on the retail industry and analyses the data collected from 15 international retailers in China. Our findings reveal six potential routes of retail business model innovations: legitimatizing brand image in the local market; sharing resources within the group, transferring knowledge from headquarters; alliance with the local stakeholders; and imitating the local competitors; and new innovation for the local market. Apart from the new innovation for the local market, five of the six routes are exploitative business model innovations. From the organizational learning perspective, these six routes can be clustered into three patterns of resource deployment: extension of existing knowledge base, embedment with the local environment, and autonomic exploration of subsidiaries (see Fig. 3). The first two patterns (extension and embedment) are exploitative learning in nature, whereas the third pattern (autonomy) is explorative. These patterns provide novel insights into the nature of the internationalization process as “multilateral rather unilateral” as in the original model of Johanson and Vahlne (1977) and the process is “also inter-organizational and not just intraorganizational” (Johanson & Vahlne, 1990: 19). They also disclose different ways of MNEs which recognize and exploit opportunities together with or against their local partners in the host market, therefore addressing the call by Forsgren (2016: 1139) regarding how various “counteracting forces affect the shape and direction of the internationalization process.”


بدون دیدگاه