6. Conclusion
Many researchers have proposed theories and studies to explore the dividend policy behavior of firms within different streams. Previous studies have focused on tax preference theories, signaling and agency cost hypotheses to explore the dividend behavior, but dividend policy is still a puzzle. The empirical literature also identifies a variety of firm-specific fundamentals, corporate governance factors, industry-specific and country-specific patterns to explain the firms’ dividend policy behaviors. However, dividend policy is still considered an unresolved finance problem (Brealey and Myers, 2005). Many questions still need to be answered since researchers have reported conflicting results. This study focuses on a new dimension, i.e., financial expertise on the board, for explaining the dividend policy dynamics in emerging markets.
We use the static (FE and RE) and dynamic models – two-step GMM estimation techniques by Arellano and Bond (1991) and Arellano and Bover (1995) – to investigate the relationship between board financial expertise and dividend policy. These results support that Pakistani firms are taking financial expertise as proxy to corporate governance and support the compliment hypothesis, while Chinese firms back the substitution hypothesis by paying less dividends. Further robustness models also confirm the presence of a significant association between dividend policy and board financial expertise in both equity markets.