دانلود رایگان مقاله انگلیسی داده کاوی کلان داده ها توسط پلیس هلندی: معیارهایی برای روش آینده تحقیق - اشپرینگر 2017

Abstract

The term Big Data refers to the phenomenon of an ever larger and increasingly complex number of digital data and data files that keep growing in scope continuously and exponentially. It is a known fact that worldwide different intelligence agencies employ automated data analysis, known as data mining, on data and data files to understand Big Data. More and more also the Dutch police use automated data analysis of data and data files and real Big Data data mining as a method of investigation in criminal proceedings. Even though Big Data data mining can be a potentially useful and effective method of police investigation, there are some uneasy aspects associated with it. These aspects should be, but so far hardly have been, a topic of discussion in the Netherlands. In this article I will reach the conclusion that in the Netherlands, based on the worldwide discussion on mass surveillance and Big data data mining by the intelligence agencies, the time has come to also regulate Big Data data mining by the police. Regulation has to emerge through the democratic legislative process. I will formulate criteria or propositions for the implementation of this legislation in the Dutch Code of Criminal Procedure. These criteria may, in an international context, be useful for the broader debate about Big Data data mining by police agencies.

6 Conclusion

In this article I have shown that already data mining is used as a method of investigation by the Dutch Police in criminal proceedings and that real Big Data data mining is on the rise. The examples of the NSA and GCHQ show a similar trend in the context of the work of security agencies in other countries. This development calls for further discussion on the nature, scope, regulation and limitations to the use of this method of investigation by the Dutch police in criminal proceedings. There has hardly been any such discussion in the Netherlands up until now. I advocate for having this discussion, not just in the Netherlands but also in other countries and that we should learn from earlier discussions regarding the powers of the intelligence agencies. It is time to start a democratic legislative process to deal with the previously mentioned issues. The criteria to feed this discussion are that this method of investigation in criminal proceedings can only be used when the element of reasonable suspicion is present, that no criminal proceedings should be initiated based solely on the outcome of automated data analysis and that the public prosecutor and certainly the judge need to play a role when the privacy of innocent civilians can be severely impacted by an automated data analysis.