4 Conclusion
This paper proposes a Bayesian Network model for predicting the cooling load of a commercial building. We show that the proposed Bayesian Network model has the potential of achieving similar or better performance than a Support Vector Machine model or an Artificial Neural Network model. In the case study, the Bayesian Network model used the lowest CPU time for training when the amount of the training data is more than ten weeks. The CPU time cost by the Artificial Neural Network model is higher than that of the Bayesian Network model by up to 5700%. Moreover, using the Bayesian Network model does not require background in sophisticated mathematical theories. These benefits suggest that the Bayesian Network model is promising for real-world applications.
In this paper, we also explore the relationship between performance of the candidate prediction models and the amount of data available to train the models. We found all the three models can’t extrapolate the training dataset. For the studied case, the three models tend to have much larger prediction deviation if the testing data point lies far distance from the training dataset. On the other hand, we also noted that increasing the amount of the training data, but not the percentage of the testing data points that are covered by the training dataset, doesn’t benefit the prediction a lot. Based on the above statement, we suggest to increase the percentage of the testing data points that are covered by the training dataset, rather than only the amount of data in the training dataset, if the three models are employed for prediction.