7. Conclusion
The application of quantum principles to model decisionmaking scenarios emerged in the scientific literature as a way to explain and understand human behaviour in situations with high levels of uncertainty that lead to the violation of the classical laws of probability theory and logic. However, many researchers are still resistant in accepting the promising advantages of these quantumlike models towards modelling decision-making scenarios. Many times it is argued that classical models can simulate these decision scenarios under high levels of uncertainty adding extra variables to the model that are not directly observed through data. That is, by including extra latent (or hidden) variables it was believed that the model could represent uncertainty in the same way as in a quantum-like model, despite the complexity of the classical model.
In this work, we study this classical conception and make a mathematical comparison between a classical Bayesian network with Latent variables with the quantum-like Bayesian network previously proposed in the work of Moreira and Wichert (2016a). Latent Variables can be defined as variables that are not directly observed from data, but they can be inferred using the information of the variables that were recorded. For a complete dataset and given the full network structure, latent variables can be estimated by simply counting how many times they can be inferred from each assignment of the observed random variables.