Abstract
This research examines the influence of temporal considerations on preferences for different conflict management styles. It also explores the mediating effect of different decision-making patterns in determining these styles. This research proposes that the extent to which individuals consider future consequences of their current activities significantly influences their decision-making patterns and consequently, their preference for different conflict management styles which could be cooperative or competitive in nature. Specifically, this research found strong support for high consideration of future consequences (CFC) leading to a reduced preference for competitive behaviour, and weak support for high CFC leading to increased preference for cooperative behaviour.
Introduction
Conflict is common in social and professional life. By definition, “Conflict is the perception of differences of interests amongst people” (Thompson, 1998, p. 4). Conflicts are inevitable when decisions are taken, and the best way to deal with conflicts is to manage them. The way in which conflict is approached determines whether it is constructive or destructive (Deutsch & Coleman, 2000). Conflicts can be constructive, bringing about positive change; or destructive, leading to losses, pain and misery (Kriesberg, 1998). Given the high stakes often involved in managing conflicts, it is important to understand the psychology behind individuals’ preferences for different conflict management styles.
Limitations
The scope of this research is restricted as the focus of this research is on measuring preferences for conflict management styles and not actual behaviour. Although there is a close relationship between intentions and behaviour as shown in the meta-analysis by Kim and Hunter (1993), future research is required to test it further. In addition, one limitation of this research is the use of self-report measures to assess the constructs used in the studies.
