5. Discussion and conclusion
Motivated by the increased attention to IC disclosure from regulatory bodies, practitioners, and researchers and the recent calls for companies to supplement and complement their traditional financial statements with IC disclosure, the objective of this empirical study is to investigate the drivers of ICR among the companies listed on the KSE. Six hypotheses were developed as to the influence of company characteristics on the level of ICR in companies listed on the KSE in 2013. ICR was hypothesized to increase with company age (H1), leverage (H2), size (H3), performance (H4), and type of auditor (H5) and vary as a function of industrial sector (H6).
The study uses the classical framework developed by Sveiby (1997) and modified by Guthrie et al. (2004) to evaluate the IC disclosure. The framework is most widely used in the ICR literature and divides IC into three main components: internal capital, external capital, and human capital. An equal weight disclosure index of 24 IC indicators was developed based on the adopted framework. To validate the completeness and comprehensiveness of the constructed IC disclosure to the Kuwaiti business environment, the index was reviewed by academic and experienced professionals. To determine the extent of ICR, content analysis was applied to the 2013 annual reports of all companies listed on the KSE. After determining the level of IC disclosure, the next step was to investigate the association between the level of ICR and a company’s attributes to explain why companies differ in their IC disclosure levels. The ICR level obtained from the IC disclosure index is used as the dependent variable and a company’s attributes are used as independent variables in a multiple regression model.