5. Conclusions
This is the first study of the consequences of high audit quality that applies a broad sample of emerging market countries. As instructively discussed by Lin and Liu (2009), high-quality auditing will be adopted only if the benefits outweigh the costs of the choice. Many benefits from high-quality auditing could arise. In this study, we focus on what has historically been assumed to be the main benefit from using a Big Four auditor, specifically, increased fund raising possibilities and lower costs of capital (Boone et al., 2010; Pittman and Fortin, 2004). Our empirical analysis suggests that these benefits are dependent on the creditor type that an MFI wants to approach. If an MFI aims to increase its international or government agency debt, the choice of a Big Four auditor can be important and effective. However, in our sample from developing and emerging markets, we are not able to document any association between the use of a Big Four auditor and access to local commercial debt. Another important aspect of our study is that we can compare capital access for nonprofit and for-profit entities that are otherwise similar. In this additional study, auditor choice appears to be more important for capital access by nonprofit entities.