Conclusions
Previous studies found a relationship between institutional factors and full IFRS adoption (Archambault & Archambault, 2009; Clements, Neill, & Stovall, 2010; Hope, Jin, & Kang, 2006; Lasmin, 2011; Ramanna & Sletten, 2014; Ritsumeikan, 2011; Shima & Yang, 2012; Zeghal & Mhedhbi, 2006; Zehri & Chouaibi, 2013), but there is a lack of studies on the adoption of IFRS for SMEs. It is very importantto study SMEs considering thatthey represent more than 95 percent of companies worldwide and make a great contribution to job creation,technological innovation and economic output. Using a sample of 84 countries and a logit regression, we analyze the influence ofinstitutionalfactors oncountries’decisionto adoptIFRS for SMEs, for both developed and developing countries. The results show that countries without a national set of financial accounting standards, that permit or require the use of full IFRS for listed companies and have a common law legal system, are more likely to adopt IFRS for SMEs. An explanation for this could be that adopting IFRS for SMEs reduces the costs of developing their own financial accounting standards. Being familiar with, and experienced in, the IFRS environment implies a reduction in transaction costs as well being better prepared to deal with its complexity. Being part of a certain group of countries partially explains adoption of IFRS for SMEs. However, regarding education level, foreign aid, quality of the national financial accounting standards and the relationship between accounting standards and tax rules,there is no evidence of those factors influencing the country level decision to adoptIFRS for SMEs. However, if education level is measured by the literacy rate and the percentage of primary school enrolment, we conclude that countries with a lower education level are more likely to adoptIFRS for SMEs, which could be explained by the lack of qualified accountants able to develop a set of financial accounting standards in the country.