Discussion and conclusion
Translating a firm's intended strategy into the behaviors and interactions that occur between a firm's employees is critical for the success of purposive organizational change and strategy implementation (Hung, 2002; McEwen et al., 1988). Yet, we have only a limited understanding of the processes and structures that enable organizational change inside the firm (Burke, 2002; Melin, 1985; Vogel, 2005). In this paper, we contribute to this understanding by considering whether the social structure and quality of networks in the firm, affect the ability of employees to maintain their work-related relationships after a formal structural change.
Theoretical contributions
With this study, we inform work that investigates the interaction between networks, formal organizational change and strategy implementation (e.g., Battilana and Casciaro, 2012, 2013; Gargiulo and Benassi, 2000; Hung, 2002; Kleinbaum and Stuart, 2014a; McEwen et al., 1988; Mohrman et al., 2003; Soda and Zaheer, 2012; Valley and Thompson, 1998; Vogel, 2005) Extant research considers a range of change outcomes including the adoption of change (Battilana and Casciaro, 2012; McEwen et al., 1988; Valley and Thompson, 1998), the extent to which an individual adapts their network in line with change objectives (Gargiulo and Benassi, 2000; Soda and Zaheer, 2012) and how networks affect the success of strategy implementation (Hung, 2002; Vogel, 2005). We further extend this body of work by showing that the maintenance of network ties highly embedded in the social structure is affected by organizational change, while relationally embedded ties remain unaffected. This has implications for future studies of intraorganizational networks, organizational change and strategy implementation. Our study shows that we have to consider both the structural and qualitative characteristics of networks. Alternatively, we may miss important nuances in how different ties are affected by structural change.