5. Discussion and conclusion
Recent discussions in the social accounting literature highlight the relative lack of attention to non-corporate perspectives in social accounting research, its sometimes light theoretical framing, and the fact that issues of accountability have not yet been fully explored (Cho and Giordano-Spring, 2015; Gray et al., 2009, 2015; Gray, 2013; Thomson, 2014). At the same time, however, a sense of the possibility of socially impactful research in the area persists (Owen, 2008; Gray, 2013; Thomson 2014). This paper explicitly incorporates non-corporate perspectives while also addressing a need for more diversity in the theoretical underpinning.of research. We use a rich, Bourdieusian theoretical frame to explore how social accounting generates local legitimacy through the pivotal participation of the community. We frame social accounting as a masking narrative that acquires symbolic power to shape relations between the company and its immediate external stakeholders. Elements of Bourdieu’s theory, particularly his work on the logic of price, on corporate patronage of the arts and on symbolic power, help us to separate the effect of social accounting from that of the deployment of economic capital. This reveals the importance of the symbolic value of the social report within the life of the community. “Domination, even when based on naked force, that of arms or money, always has a symbolic dimension, and acts of submission, of obedience, are acts of knowledge and recognition which, as such, implement cognitive structures capable of being applied to all the things of the world, and in particular to social structures” (Bourdieu, 2000:172).