6. Final Considerations
After a bibliographic and a field research with SMEs, we found that environmental issues are still not a dominant topic in product development practices, and there is great potential for the inclusion of these practices in distinct phases of the PDP, mainly in the phases before concept generation and in the post-launch phases. Nevertheless, we highlight that operational and strategic matters previously highlighted by academic research on environmentally sustainable product development process are already considered by SME. Among these activities, we highlight the ecologic integration in the project planning and production planning steps, and a strategic planning that contemplates sustainability. Yet, another relevant finding lies on the fact that SMEs are not aware of most of the methods and tools to adapt and assess the PDP’s ecological qualification.
Finally, a reference model was proposed, taking into consideration that, although some characteristics of SME’s environmental innovation management differ from the characteristics of large organizations, environmentally sustainable product development practices need to be operationalized. It is necessary to highlight that the name “reference model” is used to serve as basis and provide subsidies for companies, so that, these companies can develop specific models for their realities. Thus, despite the study providing reference system proposition, it is important to mention that organizations should customize the reference system according to their needs, objectives, and available resources. Still, observing the inherent complexity regarding current competitive contexts, the linearity serves to guide thinking and communication among stakeholders, but it also needs to be aligned to the flexibility inherent to the competency called “organizational learning”.