5. Discussion
This study identified distinct profiles of preadolescent HPA-SAM coactivation patterning and linked them to behavioral functioning and coping-related neuroendocrine recovery efficiency. Using multi trajectory modeling of HPA (sC) and SAM (sAA) index activity in response to a standardized psychosocial stressor (TSST-C), four hypothesized subgroups emerged whose sC and sAA trajectories were consistent with specific cross-system co-activation theories (Bauer et al., 2002). These trajectories were distinct with respect to both baseline levels and change patterning. Additionally, identified HPA-SAM profiles related to children’s behavioral functioning in both expected and unexpected ways, suggesting that Additive-Symmetry and Interactive-Asymmetry consistent patterns of HPA-SAM co-activation may differ for children with internalizing versus externalizing symptoms. Lastly, children with different HPA-SAM co-activation profiles used different coping skills to support neuroendocrine recovery efficiency in a manner consistent with their parent– and self–reported behavioral functioning. This study provides a fine-grained depiction of meaningful variability in preadolescent HPA-SAM co-activation while also advancing support for the claim that there are no universals to what constitutes effective coping (Wadsworth, 2015).