Conclusions and Limitations
The present text centers on a case study showing how a three-phase organizational sensemaking process culminated in the construction of unethical consumers. The process was repeatedly scrutinized in a context defined by the specific history of the organization in question. The end result has show how very context-dependent constructing unethical consumer behavior can be. It is a process that materializes in organizations whenever the elements ensuring employee recognition are undermined by the emergence of a new fringe of consumers who differ greatly from the original customer base.
Given that the study is limited to a specific cultural context, it would be interesting to complement it with investigations in similar organizations operating in different cultural contexts. Notable possibilities here include GEICO (Government Employees Insurance Company), which after initially targeting US federal employees and certain categories of enlisted military officers, has grown to provide insurance to a wide range of customers. GEICO seems to have expanded its customer base without undergoing any major crises. One possible explanation might be the difference between its initial target (a professionally oriented community comprising workers) and the one that AMDM was set up to serve (a leisure-oriented community comprising enthusiasts).