Conclusions
In conclusion, this study sheds more light on human capital resources by investigating the configurational roles of PsyCap and MarCap in marketers’ job performance, encouraging researchers to utilize an appropriate method – in this case, fsQCA – to investigate the complexity of causal relationships between human capital resources and job outcomes. The study findings also suggest that firms should pay attention to the configurations of PsyCap and MarCap, that is, the recipe is more important than the ingredients in designing and implementing human resources policies and practice. In so doing, firms will enjoy a higher level of job performance accomplished by their marketers.
It is worth noting that the present study only examines the role of PsyCap and MarCap in job performance. Future research should investigate the relationship between human capital resources and other job outcomes such as job satisfaction and job tension. In addition, the study investigates the configurational roles of PsyCap and MarCap in marketers’ job performance, that is, at the individual level. Such an investigation at a higher level (e.g. the team, unit, or firm level; Newman et al., 2014; Ployhart et al., 2014) deserves attention in future research. Finally, the focus of this study is on marketers. As previously discussed, marketers and other business professionals such as accountants may exhibit some differences. Future research should make a comparison of the role of human capital resources in job performance between marketers and other business professionals in order to discover their similarities and differences.