4. Concluding remarks
The field reconnaissance survey made in Karikusa town, Kumamoto, following the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes demonstrated that:
1) Despite strong ground shaking, liquefaction-induced damage to building in the region was limited within a narrow stretch that was reportedly an old river channel about 400 years ago and later reclaimed artificially.
2) Difference in soil behavior within and outside of the liquefied zone was mainly due to the difference in soil type and stratification, i.e., sandy soils with Ic < 2 dominate near the ground surface within, while clayey soils with Ic > 2 prevail outside the liquefied zone.
3) The liquefaction-induced relative settlement and tilting of building in the liquefied belt were generally lower than those observed in other earthquakes. This was attributed to the many lightweight wooden houses of 2 stories in the region.
4) A few old wooden houses in the liquefied belt experienced damage to their superstructures, owing to their unreinforced weak foundation based on old design specification.