دانلود رایگان مقاله روش ترکیبی برای ارزیابی شرکت اجرای معماری

Abstract

Enterprise Architecture (EA) implementation evaluation provides a set of methods and practices for evaluating the EA implementation artefacts within an EA implementation project. There are insufficient practices in existing EA evaluation models in terms of considering all EA functions and processes, using structured methods in developing EA implementation, employing matured practices, and using appropriate metrics to achieve proper evaluation. The aim of this research is to develop a hybrid evaluation method that supports achieving the objectives of EA implementation. To attain this aim, the first step is to identify EA implementation evaluation practices. To this end, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted. Second, the proposed hybrid method was developed based on the foundation and information extracted from the SLR, semi-structured interviews with EA practitioners, program theory evaluation and Information Systems (ISs) evaluation. Finally, the proposed method was validated by means of a case study and expert reviews. This research provides a suitable foundation for researchers who wish to extend and continue this research topic with further analysis and exploration, and for practitioners who would like to employ an effective and lightweight evaluation method for EA projects.

7. Conclusion

This article presented a hybrid evaluation method for EA implementation within an enterprise. The EA evaluation literature investigation carried out in this study facilitated better understanding of the proposed method’s concepts and problems. By exploring existing evaluation models, it was realized there is no comprehensive and structured model in terms of effectiveness and functionality. The method proposed in this study is light and holistic, which supports the functionality and effectiveness of EA implementation. It is easy to learn and use, applicable for all types of enterprise, usable for evaluating implemented EA artefacts, complete in terms of supporting all aspects of EA implementation, flexible in terms of providing a dynamic environment for EA evaluation, and a structured method developed based on theoretical approaches. The results of this research can be useful for academics and practitioners in employing EA projects and also extending research on EA implementation evaluation.